Evolutionary Embryology- Definition, Advent, Theory

  • Embryology, the study of embryos, is an important cornerstone of biological evolution and can be used to help determine similarities and differences between various species.
  • An embryo of an organism is the fertilized egg as it goes through the processes of development that are specific to that species.
  • When looking at how the animal develops from an embryo to an adult, you can compare the processes with those of other organisms to help determine evolutionary similarities.
  • Most embryos look similar in their early stages, but as they develop, the differences between species become more obvious.
  • Embryos of organisms that have a closer genetic relationship to one another tend to look similar for a longer period of time since they share a more recent common ancestor.
  • Thus, embryology is frequently used as evidence of the theory of evolution and the radiation of species from a common ancestor.
Evolutionary Embryology

Advent of Evolutionary Embryology

  • Charles Darwin’s theory of evolution first restructured comparative embryology and saw that embryonic resemblances would be a very strong argument in favor of the genetic connectedness of different animal groups.
  • Darwin also noted that embryonic organisms sometimes make structures that are inappropriate for their adult form but that show their relatedness to other animals.
  • He pointed out the existence of eyes in embryonic moles, pelvic rudiments in embryonic snakes, and teeth in embryonic baleen whales.
  • Darwin also argued that adaptations that depart from the “type” and allow an organism to survive in its particular environment develop late in the embryo.
  • He noted that the differences between species within genera become greater as development persists, as predicted by von Baer’s laws.
  • Thus, Darwin recognized two ways of looking at “descent with modification.” One could emphasize the common descent by pointing out embryonic similarities between two or more groups of animals, or one could emphasize the modifications by showing how development was altered to produce structures that enabled animals to adapt to particular conditions.

Embryonic Homologies

  • One of the most important distinctions made by evolutionary embryologists was the difference between analogy and homology.
  • Both terms refer to structures that appear to be similar.

Homologous structures

  • Those organs whose underlying similarity arises from their being derived from a common ancestral structure.
  • For example, the wing of a bird and the forelimb of a human are homologous.
  • Moreover, their respective parts are homologous.

Analogous structures

  • Those whose similarity comes from their performing a similar function, rather than their arising from a common ancestor.
  • For example, the wing of a butterfly and the wing of a bird are analogous.
  • The two types of wings share a common function (and therefore are both called wings), but the bird wing and insect wing did not arise from an original ancestral structure that became modified through evolution into bird wings and butterfly wings.

Embryology and Theory of Evolution

Embryology supports the theory that organisms have a common ancestor (in accordance to theory of evolution). The theory of evolution explains that not every feature of an ancestor’s embryo is shown in its descendants. That explains why embryos develop into different species over time. Different traits are present in each embryo. Once the embryo is fully developed, it creates other embryos that have similar traits.


  1. Gilbert, S. F. (2000). Developmental biology. Sunderland, Mass: Sinauer Associates.
  2. Schoenwolf, G.C., Bleyl, S.B., Brauer, P.R., Francis-West, P.H. & Philippa H. (2015). Larsen’s human embryology (5th ed.). New York; Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone.
  3. Sadler, T. W., & Langman, J. (2004). Langman’s medical embryology. Philadelphia, Pa: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
  4. Moore, K. L., Persaud, T. V. N., & Torchia, M. G. (2008). The developing human: Clinically oriented embryology. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders/Elsevier.
  5. https://www.thoughtco.com/what-is-embryology-3954781
  6. https://www.expii.com/t/evidence-of-evolution-embryological-10258
  7. https://sites.google.com/site/biology2evolutionlanesville/embryology-and evolution/embryology-what-is-it

About Author

Yashaswi Sharma

Yashaswi Sharma did her bachelor's in Microbiology from St. Xavier’s College, Kathmandu, Nepal, and completed her M.Sc. in Reproductive Biology and Clinical Embryology from AIIMS (All India Institute of Medical Sciences), New Delhi, India. She is currently doing her Ph.D. from the Polish Academy of Sciences. Her field of interest is Scientific Research, Obesity Research, Assisted Reproduction and Embryology.

6 thoughts on “Evolutionary Embryology- Definition, Advent, Theory”

  1. This is NOTHING but pure, unadulterated FRAUD! It has been almost a century-and-a-half since the German biologist, Ernest Haeckel, was charged with, and convicted of FRAUD by HIS OWN university for falsifying these same exact FAKE portrayals of embryos! Yet here they are, in the 21st century, continuing to DEFRAUD readers by promoting Haeckel’s just as FRAUDULENT “Biogenetic Law!” This is UTTERLY RIDICULOUS! This page should be taken down!

  2. You realize that the drawings shown with embryos having gill slits was proven false in 1874. Ernst Haeckel, whose drawings you use, was put on trial by his own University and he admitted that he made them up.
    The “gill slits” are actually bronchial folds that become bones in the ear and glands in the throat. You guys are liars!

    • I agree 100% Harmon! And I’m sure you’d likewise agree with me that this nearly ancient SCIENTIFIC LIE should be taken down immediately!?! (To clarify your comment for future readers these three “gill slits” from top to bottom contain the apparatus that will develop into the middle ear canals, the parathyroids, and the thymus gland – PROVING we did not “evolve” from fish!)


Leave a Comment